Re: Fixing proxy support in Fedora (was Re: Orphaning few packages)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/06/2013 04:41 PM, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I think the existing libproxy API is sane enough.

It could be better. But pacrunner's D-Bus API looks fine (mostly because
by using D-Bus you get asynchrony and cancellability for free).

It would be nice if it exposed the "Method" from
CreateProxyConfiguration as a property. Then if it's "direct", you know
you don't even have to bother calling, and if it's "manual", you know
that once you get the proxy for a particular URI, you don't have to call
again for that URI. (At least, until the next time pacrunner emits
PropertiesChanged.)

-- Dan

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux