On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 23:08:01 +0100 "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry I didn't mean to imply this was hidden. No worries, just wanted to clarify. ;) > > There are some oddities due to running RHEL on builders, but I would > > call it a pretty corner set of cases, not something to panic about. > > Actually the worse case is EPEL 6 / RHEL 6 which seem to use a RHEL 5 > kernel. I have to use an LD_PRELOAD hack to get things to to run > there [attached]. The issue wasn't with the LD_PRELOAD hack itself > which is quite small, but with the amount of days I spent debugging > this. Uh... thats... not likely. We have currently 0 RHEL5 hosts, so I am at a loss as to how a RHEL5 kernel would get used anywhere. ;( Builders are mostly RHEL6/x86_64, with 2 RHEL6 ppc64 hosts and a bunch of Fedora18 arm SOCs doing things like notifications and tag moves (they don't yet do any builds at all). Do you have a link to a task that shows this? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
