----- Original Message ----- > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need > > FedoraHosted? > > I have found it a valuable service to provide an upstream home for fedora- > specific projects. Sure, it's a great home for fedora-specific upstream, but unfortunately only for these. When I tried to set it up as upstream source control for my project, FAS account was blocker (aka I don't want another account and this one is pretty tied to Fedora), also the perception that the project is again - Fedora specific. On the other hand I read somewhere "a how to do open source project properly" - there was a question why people use other infrastructure than GitHub and recommendation that every open source project should and have to use it and people should not use bitbucket (my preferred one ;-), gitorious etc. I also don't agree with this one. To summarize it - I'm glad we have a place where we can host our Fedora related projects, that do not overpass Fedora boundaries, but I'm not sure it makes sense to try to replicate existing solutions (even our would be open in the sense of not in the hands of proprietary company etc.). Still it's worth making fedorahosted experience better. For Gitorious - KDE guys tried to move from SVN to Gitorious but they ended up with very own infrastructure, see project.kde.org, there are several blog posts - for example http://www.omat.nl/2011/09/25/kdes-infrastructure/ PS: One thing I have to note - when I was using fedorahosted service, I found out the support was always excellent! Jaroslav > > -- Rex > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
