On 2013-05-23, Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 05/23/2013 09:34 AM, James Antill wrote: >> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 16:55 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> >>> I'll get more specific then: >>> >>> python-pyface can use two different graphics backends - either wxPython or >>> pyQt4. In no way do these two packages provide the same thing in any >>> meaningful way other than to pyface. So, while one could go the provides >>> route, it doesn't seem to make sense to me. I suppose I could ask for: >>> >>> Provides: pyface-backend >>> >>> in both PyQt4 and wxPython. Think that would make sense? >> >> Add a layer, and it works perfectly: >> >> python-pyface: >> Requires: python-pyface-backend >> >> python-pyface-backend-wxPython: >> Provides: python-pyface-backend >> Requires: wxPython >> >> python-pyface-backend-pyQt4: >> Provides: python-pyface-backend >> Requires: pyQt4 >> > > Took me a little bit to realize that no actual code needed to be split out to > do this (Sandro's suggestion too much in my mind). But yes, this does the > trick nicely, at the expense of some extra dummy packages. > Do you know virtual packages are forbidden in Fedora? -- Petr -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
