On 22. 5. 2013 at 16:55:50, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 05/22/2013 04:44 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 23:30 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> different set of dependent packages, leading to some sort of > >> combinatorial explosion of QA. > > > > Right now we have approximately seven zillion combinatorial explosions > > of QA, so one more on the pile is not going to make much of an > > appreciable difference...though it could spell all kinds of fun for > > image composes, I suspect. > > > > Still, I don't see how that's really worth doing instead of just using a > > virtual provide. The OP's reasoning for not using a virtual provide > > sounded rather specious to me. The two things are functionally > > equivalent so far as I can see. Just different syntax. > > I'll get more specific then: > > python-pyface can use two different graphics backends - either wxPython or > pyQt4. In no way do these two packages provide the same thing in any > meaningful way other than to pyface. So, while one could go the provides > route, it doesn't seem to make sense to me. I suppose I could ask for: > > Provides: pyface-backend > > in both PyQt4 and wxPython. Think that would make sense? Yes :-) Thanks Jan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
