On Monday 25 February 2013 17:33:09 Andreas Schneider wrote: > On Monday 25 February 2013 10:09:50 Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 9:08 AM, Andreas Schneider <asn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > the Samba Team has announced [1] that it will remove SWAT from the Samba > > > Suite. SWAT is unmaintained and has the most security bugs. > > > > Andrew, I'm in that thread on the Samba mailing list at > > http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-February/171643.html. I > > don't see an actual decision there, just a call for discussion. Also, > > if you decide to remove the samba-swat package from the samba suite, > > should it be obsoleted or merely reported as conflicting with new > > samba-common releases, to make sure people delete it before doing > > upgrades and getting in dependency trouble? It might even be better > > pulled as part of the next Samba 4.0.4 package. > > That's why I stated below that I will remove it when it gets removed in the > Samba development tree upstream. > > I will handle the correct deinstallation of samba-swat when it gets removed > but thanks for the idea with handling it in samba-common. > > I'm sure it will take some time till it gets removed. The time has come. SWAT has been removed from Samba and I will remove it in F19 and newer now. -- andreas -- Andreas Schneider GPG-ID: 8B7EB4B8 Red Hat asn@xxxxxxxxxx Samba Team asn@xxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
