On Sat, 2013-05-18 at 06:18 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081 > > I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to > selinux-policy-devel-support, since > > "everywhere else in the distro -devel means just header files in c and not any > other development tools and we have several scripts that assume that's the case." > > selinux-policy-devel contains interface files and tools required to build > selinux-policy. It also currently contains the man pages, which I can move to > the base package. Well, there may have been some signals crossed somewhere. I've been part of the discussion about reducing the size of the desktop spin. selinux-policy-devel doesn't look bad to me, the one that looks like a problem is policycoreutils-devel : "The policycoreutils-devel package contains the management tools use to develop policy in an SELinux environment." Now *that* is a non-standard interpretation of the -devel suffix. And policycoreutils-devel requires selinux-policy-devel - a package of 'runtime' stuff depending on a package of 'build time' stuff - and various 'runtime' packages depend on policycoreutils-devel, notably the SELinux troubleshooting thing, because policycoreutils-devel contains audit2allow. That's the thicket we are trying to unpick, I believe. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
