On Fri, 17.05.13 10:18, David Lehman (dlehman@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 09:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 05/17/2013 01:31 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > On Thu, 16.05.13 16:17, Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > > > > >> Lennart Poettering (mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > >>>> RequiredBy= > > >>>> WantedBy=dmraid-activation.service > > >>>> > > >>>> I'm not using dmraid, or md raid, or any kind of raid at the moment. I also have this entry, previously explained in this thread as probably not being needed unless dmraid is being used, so is the likely offender for udev-settle. > > >>>> > > >>>> 2.823s dmraid-activation.service > > >>> > > >>> Given that this is really only needed for exotic stuff I do wonder why > > >>> we need to install this by default even. > > >> > > >> We *could* drop all the assorted local storage tools from @standard and just leave > > >> them to be installed by anaconda if they're being used to create such > > >> storage. They'd have to remain on the live image, though, and so this would > > >> not help installs done from the live images. > > > > > > Does anaconda have infrastructure for this? > > > > Yes, it already drags in for example iscsi-initiator-utils automatically when > > iscsi disks are used during install. IIRC doing the same for dmraid should > > not be hard. > > This has been in place since somewhere around F11 or F12. You just can't > tell since dmraid is in base. There is still the anaconda-tools group, > which I forget the purpose of (live media?). So, are you saying we could simply drop dmraid from base, and anaconda would do the right thing and install it when dmraid is used for the installation? Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
