On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:25:31AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > Well, I don't think glibc info doc has only developer-targetted info - > > that's the issue - there are more things useful to regular experienced > > users (like regexps info, locales info). > > In that case, glibc maintainers need to re-consider their claim that it > is only material for developers & put it in glibc-common or a glibc-docs > package instead of the -devel package I felt that the bug was closed prematurely. All of us (Ondrej, myself and Carlos) live in three different time zones and a communication lag is expected. Some time should have been allowed for all of us to come to a consensus. I don't think depending on glibc-devel is a good idea either and I made that clear on the bugzilla (again now). Carlos also seems willing to explore the idea of a glibc-docs in the interim, while we figure out how to split libc.info into separate user and developer documentation nodes. Siddhesh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
