>
> On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> > On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
> >
> > > you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
> > > longer active?
> >
> > A: The thread was started on a Friday night.
> >
> > B: Some people don't get to read mail every day, or more than a few or less
> > times a week.
> >
> > A + B = perfectly justified timing of reply.
>
> C: the debate was taken to every place it could possibly go, and the
> commit was reverted.
D: read mail, have knee jerk reaction, send email, read remainder of unread mail and realize A, B and C have already occurred and then decided it's best to read all unread mail before allowing knee to jerk the send button.
> So what's the point of reviving it? Sometimes, if you don't get your
> $0.02 posted in time, it's best to just sit on it.
Agreed.
--
John Florian
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
