Re: Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 16:42 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If they do decide to keep the change, you could escalate it to FESCo. 
> However, (speaking only for myself here) I would be VERY reluctant to
> override maintainers on their packages on something that is a design
> decision/judgement call. Where would we draw the line? 

Surely that is part of what FESCo is *for*? To give "guidance" when a
single package wants to do something that's inconsistent with what users
expect and what every other package in the distribution does.

That was my understanding when I served as part of FESCo. Perhaps things
have changed since then?

-- 
dwmw2

<<attachment: smime.p7s>>

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux