On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 11:16 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2013, Matej Cepl wrote: > > > Subject: Re: Concern about FedoraCryptoConsolidation > > > > On 2013-05-07, 04:10 GMT, Richard Levenberg wrote: > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraCryptoConsolidation > >> > >> While I understand the reasons for this idea of Consolidation I have a > >> concern that very valid use cases are being ignored or unknown. As an > >> example I have a use case supported with curl and OpenSSL like this: > > > > I wouldn't be much worried about that project. See the date of that page > > and state of the (non-)consolidation in the current Fedora. > > We should be worried. The proliferance of basement crypto is a real problem. > > If you want your package to get into RHEL, you will need to ensure your > package has no home grown crypto, and uses either nss, openssl or libgcrypt. Or gnutls (but not nettle directly!). -- Tomas Mraz No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back. Turkish proverb -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
