On Fri, 03 May 2013 16:06:36 +0200, James Hogarth
<james.hogarth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Please log this in the package review. Let's proceed with the rest of
the
review and look at renaming as a separate issue later.
The current maintainers of community-mysql stated that their preference
was to wait for F20 for community-msql 5.6 a couple of weeks back given
that we are well past Feature Freeze, Branch, Alpha and only a few days
off
the Translation Deadline...
If the renaming is to be left as a separate issue then what specifically
is
left for F19?
The current maintainers have stated that they don't intend to maintain the
package much longer, and we've volunteered to maintain it. Exactly how and
when a transition of maintainership is done is still not decided, but
please at least review our first package submission.
We've been open about the intention to upgrade to 5.6 for months, but have
respectfully waited to submit since the change of default has been
difficult enough without introducing yet another variable into the
equation. Now that the dust has settled and we seem to have a default
selection that works, it's time to upgrade.
I see review requests on the list for new packages that people want into
F19, so I don't see how it could be too late for upgrading an existing
package.
Regards,
Norvald H. Ryeng
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
