On Sat, May 04, 2013 at 09:42:22AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2013-05-04 at 04:58 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > No, this isn't the most appropriate mailing list for the discussion - > > anaconda-devel-list is a better choice if you want to interact with the > > people who actually work on that code. > > That is not actually what Dan wanted to do, though. If you read his > mail, his intent was to bring this decision to the awareness of a wider > audience that might have a stake in it. For that purpose, his choice of > this list was entirely appropriate; few people besides anaconda > developers read anaconda-devel-list, so choosing that list would not > have achieved his purpose. The context was me replying to Rahul, who appeared to think that the best way to cause the decision to be reconsidered was to re-open the bug. Raising awareness on devel is a perfectly reasonable thing to do, but further discussion here is not likely to actually change anything in itself. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel