On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 08:52:25PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: >> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > And if the maintainers feel more than justified in closing it again? >> > Bugzilla isn't a discussion forum. If disagree with a deliberate policy >> > decision, discuss it on an appropriate mailing list. >> >> Isn't that what we're doing? That's exactly the point of this email thread. > > No, this isn't the most appropriate mailing list for the discussion - > anaconda-devel-list is a better choice if you want to interact with the > people who actually work on that code. In any case, I was disagreeing > with Rahul's assertion that he was justified in re-opening a bug merely > because he disagreed with a design choice. > > (Please trim the emails you're replying to. It's a pain to have to > cut out my own signature just to make the mail coherent in isolation) > -- > Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel This is a wider audience. I believe this was a better group of people to ask. Dan -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
