Re: Q: webfonts:

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le Ven 3 mai 2013 21:06, Alec Leamas a écrit :

> Still hesitating a here: if upstream has decided to support the widest
> possible set of browsers (including IE):  should we really just drop the
> formats required by IE?  From a user perspective, I don't really follow
> this although I do understand your line of reasoning.

Here is the current status of @font-face ttf/otf support in browsers:
http://caniuse.com/ttf

Normal opentype files work in the latest versions of all browsers (except
opera mini :p)

Adding special webfont formats is not worth the pain, and anyway the main
use would be old ie versions, that require eot which is not a really open
format.

> I'm truly a font newbie. That said, is there really a meaningful
> fallback for a font such as sozial
> (https://github.com/adamstac/zocial)?  I. e., is there a reasonable
> fallback for a Facebook button?

I think spot will agree there is no way we'll ever ship a font consisting
of company logos, it's trademark hell
(this is another example that proves the wisdom of checking every font,
even 'special' 'embedded' ones)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux