On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:43:53PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 24.4.2013 13:35, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:27:49AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >>Seems to be due to systemd-202: > >>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956035 > >It's a bug in glibc actually: > > > >http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15339 > > > >I found it in gnulib testing yesterday: > > > >http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2013-04/threads.html#00040 > > > >Rich. > > > > Well, I would blame glibc, but even if that is glibc, it is exposed > just with systemd-202 and not systemd-201. This is interesting to me > and I would love to know the reasons. I am not expert here, so I > hope somebody can explain. Thanks. It may be a different bug in that case. The glibc bug affects all processes that call getaddrinfo [when there is no network, as in Koji], whether or not systemd is even installed in the same buildroot. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
