On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 03:37:03PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: > In a large package (openerp7) I have found some bundled .ttf and > .otf font files. One of these (Inconsolata) seems to exist in Fedora > as levien-inconsolata-fonts, the others (see below) I cannot find > with a quick search. > > The fonts are parts of specific addons (a. k. a. plugins). They are > referenced with explicit paths in various .css or css/* files. > > The entypo-webfont.ttf seems to have a working upstream > http://www.entypo.com. > I cannot find an upstream for mnmliconsv21-webfont.ttf, hint is that > it's generated by "Font Squirrel" ?! > There seem to be an upstream for zocial-regular-webfont.ttf, at > https://github.com/adamstac/zocial, providing a woff file. > > Now, what should I do with these? Packaging GL tells me to "avoid" > bundling ttf/otf files. What's this in this case? > > Utterly confused. Any hint, out there? We had a similar problem with a package a few weeks ago: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-April/009046.html The first thing to work out: Does simply deleting the font file(s) make any difference to the documentation / package? In our case, the packager could simply delete the file [in %install] and it appeared to make absolutely no difference to the rendered HTML documentation, thus problem solved :-) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests. http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
