On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:55:02 +0200 Rave it <chat-to-me@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 +0000 > schrieb devel-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > > For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout > having more infomation what the user did if abrt would trigered. > Maybe thy played arround without knowledge about the programm and did > wrong things? > Better the abrt guys forced the user to write what they did if abrt > trigger a alarm. > For me a bug whithout a comment isn't a bug. > And honestly, if i get such bugs without a comment, i asked the user > friendly what they did. > In case of 50% i get no answer. 50% is much higher than I have gotten. ;) On any new abrt bugs I get, I typically: - Check to see if the submitter filled in the 'description of problem' which something I could try and work into a reproducer. I'd say perhaps 1% do. - If not, then I ask them what they were doing when the crash happened and if they can reproduce it. I'd say 90% never reply to that and the bug sits there until EOL. Some folks do, and those I can gather info from or ask various troubleshooting things which often results in a fix or at least an upstream bug. I'm not personally finding these faf reports of much use. They seem to have a sanitized backtrace with even less info in them, and I also have no way at all of finding out from people who saw this what they were doing or ask them debugging steps. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
