Re: Trimming (or obsoleting) %changelog?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> Why does it have to be date based?
> Why not having a count based cutoff?
> Like last N entries.

Neither is definately the correct thing to do.

All changes starting with the most recent upstream release should stay,
as that tells you (or at least should tell you) the difference between
foo-1.2.3 (upstream) and foo-1.2.3-4.fc18 (apparently 4th release for
Fedora 18).

Automated rebuild entries could be be dropped as soon as the next build
is done.

Any CVE references should probably stay until there's a new upstream
release (no matter how old or how many).
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux