Re: Expanding the list of "Hardened Packages"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15/04/13 10:10 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> I would say there is a place for SE Linux even if we compiled everything with 
> "all" because FORTIFY_SOURCE coverage is not absolute. For example, about a 
> month ago i ran the following test:
> 
> procs=`ls /proc | grep '^[0-9]' | sort -n`
> for p in $procs
> do
> 	res=`cat /proc/$p/maps 2>/dev/null |  awk '$2 ~ "wx" { print $2 }'`
> 	if [ x"$res" != "x" ] ; then
> 		cat /proc/$p/cmdline | awk '{ printf "%-35s\t", $1 }'
> 		printf "%s\n" "$p"
> 	fi
> done
> 
> 
> What this does is display the programs with Writable and Executable memory. 
> All Fedora desktops except Mate have WX memory. (I checked KDE, Gnome, 
> Cinnamon, and Mate.)

FWIW, LXDE seems to be fine as well (if polkitd and firefox are not counted
in).

-- 
Jan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux