On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Saturday, April 13, 2013 12:19:42 PM Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> Is there a tracker bug? Proven packagers can help > > I have a tracker bug for issues identified on the core set of packages that > would be part of a common criteria certification: > > I have not run the script that checks a distribution on F19 yet, so maybe > there are more? > I have analyzed all F9 packages and have already published a list of packages violating packaging guidelines. See http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1522424/probable-violations-F19.csv (I made some last minute changes which might be buggy. Feedback and corrections are welcome!) Also note that all this analysis stuff has been *automated*. Additionally, my code works for all RHEL and Fedora versions (and even deb based distributions). The analysis code doesn't install any packages on the system, is host OS agnostic and is quite fast (scales linearly). See https://github.com/kholia/checksec (currently only the interactive tools are described in the README, bulk analysis tools are hopefully intuitive enough). -- Dhiru -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
