Re: package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 4.4.2013 18:11, Mattias Ellert napsal(a):
tor 2013-04-04 klockan 17:29 +0200 skrev Vít Ondruch:
Dne 4.4.2013 16:20, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
esthetics.

May be I misunderstood the thread, but wasn't this the main point since
the beginning? To prevent the "naming-with-version" exploit as is still
stated in the $SUBJECT?

It might looks like the thread would be named like "how to install
multiple versions on single package" but it was not. Clearly, there are
ways. There are even policies in place. The brainstorming was how to do
it right, but there is no will. Every steak holder just repeats how to
achieve it currently, no how to do it right.
I think you misunderstand here. I think the replies contain the current
way, not because it is the current way, but because those who reply
consider the current way to be the right way. For me the current way
makes sense and I would not like to change it.

	Mattias


I'd love to hear stories how somebody tried and failed. I want to see footprints of this attempts in code, in branches of source repositories. I have seen non yet. I've just heard why not to try.

BTW I am not saying the current way does not make sense in current state. That does not mean we cannot do better.

Vít
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux