Re: package, package2, package3 naming-with-version exploit

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Tomas Mraz <tmraz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>  Here is a long list of technical reasons why your desire to have all
> the parallel installable versions of "foo" called "foo" is not going to
> work.

I can imagine only one reason for this desire - so that the user can do
just "yum install foo" when he just wants the latest version of "foo".

That is a reasonably valid desire (well, "the preferred version", not necessarily "the latest version"), and we can already handle it well today - look at the "python" package that is actually Python 2.x, and look how it Provides: python2.

Sadly https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Multiple_packages_with_the_same_base_name doesn't currently require this behavior - Vít tried to have the guideline amended and FPC refused (I haven't read the detailed rationale so I won't comment on it further).


However, note that this has _nothing_ to do with parallel installable versions: We want (yum install foo) to install a specific version of foo, not all versions of foo.
    Mirek
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux