On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Richard Marko <rmarko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 03/21/2013 02:50 PM, Richard Marko wrote: > > In last two weeks these components were crashing the most: > > 1. kernel seen 45496 times (36% of all reports) > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/586553/ > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/258569/ > > 2. xulrunner seen 12020 times (9% of all reports) > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/244577/ > http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/faf/problems/294757/ > > > > These two quite popular problems both contain proprietary modules so I would > like to use this opportunity to start a discussion about inclusion of > reports containing proprietary or non-supported modules in our statistics. > > My questions are: > - are these helpful or not? For the kernel, no. ABRT won't even file to bugzilla if the proprietary taint flag is set, so we will never look at them. If someone manually files it, we close it as WONTFIX unless they can recreate it without that module loaded. > - should we exclude them from our statistics completely or provide a way to > hide them? For the kernel, I would exclude it them from the statistics. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
