Am 19.03.2013 18:40, schrieb Richard Vickery: > > > > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Am 19.03.2013 13:42, schrieb Michal Sekletar: > > On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 11:27 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >>> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: > >>>> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. > >>>> > >>>> That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say > >>>> that anywhere? > >>> > >>> but WHY are they not saying it clearly? > > > > Yes, they are saying it very clearly (see [1]) > > ok, so anything which refers to /bin and /sbin is a bug > after the UsrMove exactly as i felt > > wow, there are lot of bugs over the distribution > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Filesystem_Layout > In addition, Fedora packages MUST NOT place files or directories in the /bin, /sbin, /lib or /lib64 directories. > Instead, the /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/lib, and /usr/lib64 directories must be used. Packages must assume that > /bin, /sbin, /lib, and /lib64 are symbolic links to the /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/lib, and /usr/lib64 directories, > respectively > > This might be unrelated, but the latest conversations, this on in particular, make me wonder: Did I miss a > preupgrade, or is the above inquiry still focused around F18 bugs? it is independent of F18/F19/Rawhide i had all sorts of troubles in my daily usage of F17/F18 resulting in the unfinsihed UsrMove and that one packager does not know what the other does because some does not care about changes in the distribution at all
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
