On 19 March 2013 11:03, Marc Deop i Argemí <marc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:27:16 Christof Damian wrote: > >> > Fixing an apostrophe – no Umlaut, not apostrophe. > >> > Fixing our UTF-8 handling – definitely yes > > The issue here is not only about the Fedora's release name rather than > fixing our UTF-8 handling. Sounds like an important bug to fix, at least to > me > I generally haven't had problems with UTF-8 stuff, though of course I'm not a heavy user (which is not the same as not using it). However are the bug or bugs in question serious enough that introducing a change which will require them to be fixed before the next release is only a minor compounding factor? Because we're not talking about not improving unicode handling, we're talking about backing off a change which causes problems with things as they are at the minute. Or, to put it another way, for Fedora 18, Fedora got a lot of publicity for being late to release. The project was able to say, quite reasonably, "The installer has undergone a major rewrite, and we want to make sure all the problems are ironed out first." For Fedora 19 do we want to say, "We're late to release because we wanted to put an 'ö' in the release name."? -- imalone http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
