Re: fedora release name problem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 10:01 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: 
> Dne 19.3.2013 04:05, Chris Murphy napsal(a):
> > On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Andre Robatino <robatino@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >> If we do, shouldn't there be another vote asking if it's okay to make this
> >> change, in light of the possible release delay?
> > Definitely not. There is equivalent that doesn't require apostrophe or umlaut (diaeresis) characters. Legal will have a far less difficult time with this than flat out incorrect spellings, or new names.
> >
> >> It's not the name that was originally voted for.
> > Schrodinger is not the man's name, and is the wrong solution. Schroedinger is as acceptable as Schrödinger.
> 
> Yes, definitely Schroedinger if Schrödinger does not work.

Could it be a Cat of Schroedinger perhaps?
-- 
Tomas Mraz
No matter how far down the wrong road you've gone, turn back.
                                              Turkish proverb

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux