On Fri, 15.03.13 11:07, Dan Mashal (dan.mashal@xxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 03/15/2013 07:00 PM, Dan Mashal wrote: > >> > >> Looks like you guys added provides(service) and fixed the problem. > > > > > > Yes, Lukáš added it. He even mentioned it in the email that started this > > thread. Still it would be nice to drop legacy provide name after packages > > stop Requiring it. > > > > > > Michal > > > > Well I was reading an IRC discussion on devel. I'm like a horse with > blinders. "This used to work and doesn't anymore". Which leads me to > my next point: What does it hurt to have the command there? In fact > you should just rename "systemctl" "service" and make it understand > service commands. It's annoying over all. Nope, I am pretty sure I won't add code to systemctl itself to manipulate /etc/rc.d/... It's OK to invoke "service" from "systemctl", and that's what we do if we are run for a SysV service. It's also OK to invoke "systemctl" from "service", and that's also what is being done. But merging the codebases, no thank you. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
