Am 17.03.2013 17:12, schrieb Sérgio Basto: > On Sáb, 2013-03-16 at 19:42 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 16.03.2013 19:26, schrieb Rex Dieter: >>> Lukáš Nykrýn wrote: >>> >>>> After usr move packages should not install files to /sbin. >>> >>> That's not necessarily true. Do our packaging guidelines actually say that >>> anywhere? >> >> but WHY are they not saying it clearly? >> until now UsrMove is a half-baken thing > > No, with UsrMove you have symbol links > ll / > bin -> usr/bin > lib -> usr/lib > lib64 -> usr/lib64 > sbin -> usr/sbin > > I'm not sure, but I'd say, you must have the symbol links and hwat does this change on the fact that the real location is /usr/sbin/service and /usr/bin/bash >> see below - what the hell, /usr/bin/bash is a valid shell >> >> [root@fileserver:~]$ system-config-users >> The value for the SHELL variable was not found the /etc/shells file >> This incident has been reported >> >> [root@fileserver:~]$ cat /etc/shells >> /bin/sh >> /bin/bash >> /sbin/nologin >> >> [root@fileserver:~]$ cat /etc/passwd | grep root >> root:x:0:0:root:/root:/usr/bin/bash and if both are valid both have to be valid as shell in ANY context or anything changed to the physical location
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
