On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 18:03:18 +0100, Honza Horak <hhorak@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 03/13/2013 09:27 AM, Norvald H. Ryeng wrote:
We now changed the Requires in akonadi-mysql to mariadb-server to be
sure of what we get.
This dependency is a problem. It makes it impossible to install
MySQL-server on a KDE system since mariadb-server and MySQL-server
conflict.
I don't think conflict is actually the main problem -- the inability
of RPM to un-ambigously choose one of the two packages that provide
the same symbol *is* the real problem. If we solved that one,
MySQL-server could provide right symbol and KDE system would be happy.
I fully agree that enforcing the default is the main problem. It makes
the whole ting very difficult.
Package conflict is a problem as soon as packages start depending on one
particular server or tools implementation (e.g., akonadi-mysql). If both
have the same virtual provide and all packages depend on that instead of
a specific implementation, they can be conflicting.
Yeah, but on the other hand, as soon as there are still packages that
doesn't depend on a specific one (use just mysql or mysql-server) -- we
need to keep the API the same -- by API I mean name of the systemd unit
file, utilities names, ...
As I see it, there are two options:
1. Conflicting packages. All dependent packages depend on the virtual
provide.
2. Non-conflicting, parallel installable packages. Dependent packages
can depend on the virtual provide or directly on one server
implementation.
If the servers are conflicting and other packages start depending on
specific servers instead of the virtual provide, users will get into
unnecessary and unresolvable conflicts.
Regards,
Norvald H. Ryeng
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
