I have the Adaptec AIC-7902 controller. This is a bigger number than the controller listed in the first line of the i2o compatibles. Is this OK? ----- Looks like I don't currently have i2o installed [root@hoho2 user1]# /sbin/lsmod | grep i2o zit, nada However, I do have the i2o_proc.ko module hanging around in what looks like a good spot (smp 607) [root@hoho2 user1]# find / -name i2o_proc.ko -print /lib/modules/2.6.8-1.603/kernel/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_proc.ko /lib/modules/2.6.8-1.607smp/kernel/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_proc.ko /lib/modules/2.6.8-1.607/kernel/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_proc.ko /lib/modules/2.6.8-1.603smp/kernel/drivers/message/i2o/i2o_proc.ko What is the easiest (and safest) way to proceed from this starting point, without having to go back to anacondo (the big bang stage). Can I just do: /sbin/insmod i2o_proc.ko /sbin/lsmod | grep i2o and then reboot? Or stick something into /etc/modprobe.conf ?? BobG On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:12:03 -0400, Alan Cox wrote: >On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 10:08:02AM -0500, Bob Gustafson wrote: >> 1) will I get any benefit from using i20 (i.e., faster, safer, more disk >> fail info, etc.) > >dpt_i2o and the generic i2o are both drivers that talk the same messages >to the hardware. The former is dpt specific the latter is all i2o > >> 2) will I risk screwing up my current disk data? > >I'd hope not > >> 3) does smartd info work through i20 ? > >Should do > >-- >fedora-devel-list mailing list >fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
