Re: Should I mention kde-3.3.1?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Should I mention kde-3.3.1?
From: Lars <terraformers@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 15:33:51 +0200
List-archive: </archives/fedora-devel-list>
List-help: <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-id: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list.redhat.com>
List-post: <mailto:fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
List-subscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list>, <mailto:fedora-devel-list-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <ckj8h8$erq$1@sea.gmane.org>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora Core <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: news <news@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

somehow
ftp://ftp.kde.org/pub/kde/stable/3.3.1/RedHat/Fedora2/i386/kdebase-3.3.1-0.1.i386.rpm
is 99megs big! 
hmmm... anyone tried it?

L


Neal D. Becker wrote:

> Subject says it all.
>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should I mention kde-3.3.1?
  - From: Than Ngo

References:
- Should I mention kde-3.3.1?
  - From: Neal D. Becker

Prev by Date: Re: APM/ACPI on ThinkPads [ Was: Fedora Core 3 Bug Status - 2004-10-11]
Next by Date: Re: Should I mention kde-3.3.1?
Previous by thread: Should I mention kde-3.3.1?
Next by thread: Re: Should I mention kde-3.3.1?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux