----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:57:00PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: > > I'm not doubting your technical skills. I'm making a few points. > > > > b) sometimes you have a LOT of packages to push out. > > c) sometimes even you yourself don't know what to put in the notes. > > d) sometimes there's really not much else to put at all. > > This sounds like updates that SHOULDN'T be pushed. If update has no > changes worth mentioning, it is trivial - trivial updates should not > be pushed. I understand the trivial update more as trivial change in a SPEC file, not a new minor upstream release. Maybe it needs more clarification. For example a typo fix in description field in a SPEC file, it's definitely not worth to issue an update and disturb user with an update. And yes, sometimes even typo could be a reason for update if it misleads users in a bad manner (not likely). The second part is clear - if the release fixes only Windows build issue, no reason to update and I expect our maintainers are clever enough not to update it ;-) Jaroslav > > -- > Tomasz Torcz Morality must always be based on > practicality. > xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx -- Baron Vladimir Harkonnen > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
