Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Colin Walters (walters@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
>> On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 16:58 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>>
>> > We don't ship in a way that easily allows this though, now. Admittedly,
>> > this is due to the sheer *amount* of stuff involved in just maintaining
>> > single versions of things, and how much that would jump if we started
>> > having multiple versions available all the time.
>>
>> To be clear, I am not suggesting multiple versions.  The suggestion is
>> that the old version of mesa overrides the new version and the tests
>> (and users) get it.
>>
>> Pretend like we bumped the Epoch.
>
> That requires more tooling changes, of course. (Or really dirty tricks
> in the repodata).

Or we could just use epoch ... yes I know it is "ugly" etc etc but ...
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux