On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:20:08 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > "When I asked you to repost with just a link, I didn't mean also > > attach the orig email with the 20k spec file that was the reason the > > mail was too long in the first place." > > maybe you should make clearer what you want if you force people to > search in their archives because add the SPEC was a niceness from me > to explain the rest of my post - my "mariadb.spec" is much smaller as > many posts To be clear, this was me, in my role as moderator of this list. I just don't think every subscriber on this list wants a copy of your mariadb spec when interested people can just follow a link to it. > > The moderator gave the following reason for rejecting your request: > > "Can you file a bug with your suggested mysql improvements, and/or > > repost this with just a link to your spec. Thanks" > > my post contained the SPEC-file which is plaintext and the sources and > patches are the same as in the MariaDB src.rpm from koji, and as i > said there are a lot of changes besides the Obsoltes/Provides which > are far away from fedora guidelines Right. I suggest you file a bug and note your specific improvements for the mariadb maintainers. They can evaluate them, there's no reason it needs to be on the list. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
