Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 4:15 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote:

Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream?

No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I don't immediately see that you'd want it for MATE purposes (or really any other Fedora purposes); it's a Unity thing. I packaged and used to own it for my aborted plan to try and package Unity, and it's orphaned because I don't want it any more. I don't think it has any dependencies in Fedora, and I think it's pretty useless if you're not running Unity.
Then why not just retire it properly? I mean of course someone could step up to package unity in fedora but then, how likely and realistic is that?
As a side note I was also wondering why so many "important" packages like hicolor-icon-theme were orphaned and I can't recall any announcement on -devel or -announce about that.
Johannes

bamf is in a similar position, but at least _something_ - gnome-pie, whatever that is - requires it. So it might actually be more useful for someone to pick that up.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux