----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michel Alexandre Salim" <salimma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, 25 February, 2013 7:30:56 PM > Subject: Re: Seeking primary maintainer for LLVM > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 25/02/13 13:06, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 11:49:49AM +0700, Michel Alexandre Salim > > wrote: > >> - - Refactorig LLVM's build system to properly use versioned > >> shared objects. I note that other distributions, and BSD, are > >> still using static linking, so we appear to be the only ones > >> attempting to package LLVM properly. - - Dealing with Clang > >> breaking when GCC is updated, and compatibility issues with > >> secondary architectures > >> > >> Thanks to Jens for doing the 3.2 update -- and others who've > >> been contributing packaging patches. > >> > >> Let me know if you're interested, and I'll release the package > >> then. > > > > I've never looked at llvm internals before, but it would be a fun > > challenge for me. I can take it up if you're OK with things being > > broken occasionally while I figure things out. Of course, if > > someone else who has a clue wants to take it up, I'd like it if I > > could co-maintain. > > > Given that Mesa depends on LLVM, I suppose brokenness in anything but > Rawhide is not really advisable. > > I'd be happy to give you and Jens co-maintainership though, until a > more permanent maintainer steps forward (ideally one of those who > have > committed semi-regularly before). I expect myself, ajax or glisse need to step up to this, I'm probably worst choice at the moment, but I can at least find the time with juhp to the llvm/mesa lockstep updates. Dave. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
