Re: Most buggy packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Most buggy packages
From: Christopher Meng <cickumqt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:02:48 +0800
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <512354E7.3030100@redhat.com>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I've hit gnomeshell problem for 13 times and rtythmbox for 7 times.

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- Most buggy packages
  - From: Miroslav Suchý

Prev by Date: Re: 64-bit stat (or not) in 32-bit Fedora binaries
Next by Date: Re: Should MariaDB touch my.cnf in %post?
Previous by thread: Most buggy packages
Next by thread: Abrt (was Re: Most buggy packages)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux