If the user has a preference, the user is capable of opening the "preferences" and change the settings. It's what's best for the users who doesn't have a preference that should be the default setting. I suggest someone do some simple and unofficial usability testing on browsers. If such tests exists, point me to the results. Is epiphany easier to use for the new computer user? Is it easier for the windows user? Personally I believe that epiphany is the better choice for default browser. It's simpler, it's integrated in the desktop environment and it has bookmarks that doesn't work like files. To most people, files and folders doesn't make sense anyway. Epiphany does have it's rough edges, but most of the issues people are having with epiphany is that it's not working like <insert name of random browser here>. If you want some other browser, that browser (in most cases) is available. Again, users with preferences are capable of selecting their preferences either during install or right after. The defaults should be directed at the users without preferences. lÃr, 09,.10.2004 kl. 16.28 +0300, skrev Panu Matilainen: > Is FC3 really going to ship with Epiphany as the default browser? I mean > .. uh, there's this other, far more capable yet very user friendly > browser there called Firefox. Epiphany doesn't even let me arrange my > bookmarks the way I want them :( Not to mention utter lack of > configurability for things like allowing popups from certain sites etc. > > - Panu - > -- Sindre Pedersen Bjordal <foolish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> www.fedoraforum.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dette er en digitalt signert meldingsdel
