On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:47:13 +0200 Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think Kevin was talking about "normal", ie non-debuginfo packages > like the example case of nacl-devel owning /usr/lib/debug, which > indeed is a (trivial) packaging bug. Except perhaps for the > filesystem package which is fairly special case anyway. Indeed I was. I was thinking we were talking about packages that mistakenly are shipping their debuginfo in the real package. > OTOH because -debuginfo packages always own all the relevant > directories there's no need for filesystem to own them, which would > allow for a nice and clean rule: any non-debuginfo package owning the > *debug directories can be considered an unnecessary multiple > directory ownership (and a bug of sorts). Sounds fine to me. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
