Re: [Mass Rebuild] Strange parsing of %%doc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On 02/16/2013 01:21 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> >
> > I've seen Panu commenting on it before, so I've searched a bit:
> > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-January/176565.html
Thanks, I didn't read the whole thread back then :-/

On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 14:06:44 +0200 
Panu Matilainen wrote:
> Yup. Rpm >= 4.11 does not (and is unlikely to ever to) support all
> the shell-quoting styles that accidentally worked in older versions.
> 
> Rpm >= 4.10.3 supports double-quoting in %doc so in Fedora >= 18 you
> can now use
>      %doc "CC-BY-SA 3.0 Attribution"
> 
> ...but if you need spec compatibility across all Fedora (and RHEL) 
> versions, whitespace in %doc needs to be worked around with globs.
> 
> Guess I should backport the double-quoting support to F17 too to
> allow consistency within the currently active Fedora versions.
> 
Thanks!

Martin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux