On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:44:27 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 02/15/2013 11:58 PM, Till Maas wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:50:28AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > >> - make a script to identify all the packages that are broken and > >> shipping debug stuff. > > AT least for the directory a simple yum call should suffice: > > yum --disablerepo '*' --enablerepo fedora\* whatprovides /usr/lib/debug > > > > But it shows that a lot (all?) debuginfo packages own the directory > > which probably needs to be fixed in rpm itself. > > > > Regards > > Till > I have filed a bug against filesystem: BZ 911831. > > I get 46 owners of /usr/lib/debug, that can't be all debug packages... Please do post the list somewhere. Also, are you running i686 or x86_64? 46 packages is not reproducible on x86_64 (albeit running Rawhide not F18). # setarch i686 repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib/debug/.build-id/ nacl-devel-0:20110221-3.fc19.i686 # setarch i686 repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib/debug/ nacl-devel-0:20110221-3.fc19.i686 # repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib/debug/ nacl-devel-0:20110221-3.fc19.i686 # repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib/debug/.build-id nacl-devel-0:20110221-3.fc19.i686 # repoquery --whatprovides /usr/src/debug filesystem-0:3.2-2.fc19.x86_64 # > Shall we file a bug against rpm, saying that claiming the complete path > doesn't really work? Why doesn't it work? -- Fedora release 19 (Rawhide) - Linux 3.8.0-0.rc7.git3.1.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.10 0.14 0.19 -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
