On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:03:50 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 02/14/2013 11:19 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 16:36:03 +0100, Alec Leamas wrote: > > > >> Running some automated tests I stumble over the debug directories. E. g., > >> > >> $ repoquery -qf /usr/lib/debug > >> > >> shows 45 owners on current F18. Other directories under /usr/lib/debug > >> have a similar situation with many owners.. > >> > >> I note that /usr/src/debug is owned by filesystem, but filesystem does > >> not own /usr/lib/debug. > >> > >> Is all this on purpose, or is something broken here? Thinking about it, > >> we never require anything for the debug package AFAICT. What's the story? > > It depends on what the package stores below /usr/lib/debug. > > Here's one that is mispackaged: > > > > # repoquery -qf /usr/lib/debug > > nacl-devel-0:20110221-3.fc19.i686 > > > > -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=3336721 > > > > It includes the -debuginfo package contents in the -devel package, most > > likely because it does a lazy'n'risky %{_libdir}/* in its %files section. > > > Thanks for reply... Still, I'm puzzled about 45 packages owning > /usr/lib/debug, none of them the filesystem package. This looks weird, > although I don't grasp the consequences (if any). Which packages are returned for your query? I've tried "repoquery --whatprovides /usr/lib/debug" for both x86_64 and i686, but it doesn't return anything other than nacl-devel. Do you have any -debuginfo packages installed from a -debuginfo repo? Those do own /usr/lib/debug and /usr/src/debug. rpm -qa \*debuginfo -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
