Re: glpk soname bump expected?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hmm, that makes it seem even more likely that upstream fat-fingered
> something.
>
> Although: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/glpk.html
> does indicate that ABI has been broken (although it has been done so in the
> past without bumping the soname).

Looks like this has been brought up on an upstream mailing list:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-glpk/2013-01/msg00081.html
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux