David Tardon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:26:35PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
>> Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>> > My understanding is that /usr/bin/soffice is a symlink in order to
>> > keep backwards maintainability. Personally I say both packages drop it
>> > because star office is soooo 1999. :)
>>
>> There's more than just soffice:
>>
>> $ rpm -ql libreoffice-core | grep bin/ | xargs ls -ld
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 362 Dec 6 18:37 /usr/bin/libreoffice
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 32 Dec 6 18:37 /usr/bin/ooffice
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 39 Dec 6 18:37 /usr/bin/ooviewdoc
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 11 Jan 9 12:46 /usr/bin/openoffice.org ->
>> libreoffice
>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 38 Jan 9 12:46 /usr/bin/soffice ->
>> /usr/lib64/libreoffice/program/soffice
>> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 360 Dec 6 18:37 /usr/bin/unopkg
>
> There is also /usr/bin/oowriter, oocalc, ooimpress, oodraw and oobase
> that belong to other libreoffice-* subpackages.
Ugh. That's just one more reason to not allow the Apache fork to be
packaged.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
