Am 03.02.2013 20:22, schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 17:53 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 03.02.2013 17:50, schrieb M. Edward (Ed) Borasky: >>> Fedora used to have Smolt and there are tools to figure out what >>> packages people use. There's no reason Fedora *can't* be data driven, >>> but there's a whole lot of "business" process stuff you'd need to >>> commit to for it to work without wasting precious energy and hours of >>> pointless arguments. ;-) >> >> data like from smolt are useless! > > For you maybe, but I have had a discussion at the last FUDCon where > someone actually said it was useful to him. > Please avoid generalization. useful to count what? you need users ACTIVELY use it you need users ACTIVELY use it after dist-upgrades the only thing smolt stats are showing is that someone used something with no reference if he still use the same after a year - these numbers does not prove anything
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
