On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 02:39:56PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 01/31/2013 02:04 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > >And it's the same situation as with MariaDB and MySQL. Fedora is going to > >prefer MariaDB (FESCo stated it clearly yesterday) - so we should try to make > >an effort to support MariaDB and not for example force users to use both just > >to run system. But on the other hand - if there's someone (and both are from > >upstream), who's going to take a burden of maintainance - why not? It can > >fail, they will loose interest one day - yes, could happen. And there's > >possibility that these projects even coming from same roots will diverge and > >become totally different projects... > > "Fedora is going to prefer MariaDB (FESCo stated it clearly yesterday)" > > It did now? If that's the case then I would like a full fledge > statement from FESCO saying so and a discussion what is supposed to > be the distribution "default" database and promote postgresql as an > candidate to take that part thus leaving our users out of yet > another sunacle fiasco... If you want to argue about MariaDB, could you please start another thread? It is totally irrelevant in the context of this thread. D. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
