On Thu, 2004-10-07 at 11:41, Nathan Grennan wrote: > I think overall it what it comes down to is that SELinux micro-manages > security way too much. SELinux's level of security might be suitable in > some situations, but will be too much of a burden in most situations. http://www.nsa.gov/selinux/papers/inevit-abs.cfm -- Stephen Smalley <sds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> National Security Agency
