On Thu, 2013-01-24 at 11:18 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > But we would need the autoqa part to exist and be ready for this. > > I dunno what the scope of autoqa is, but even a simple dependancy > check would be sufficient - no need to wait for a full automated > qa system to be built. A 'simple' dependency check is one of the two main autoqa tests as things stand: depcheck. It is not sufficiently reliable to be enforced, and it cannot be made so without some serious engineering work, so tflink tells me. There's really no such thing as a 'simple' dependency check which will be at all reliable. as depcheck stands, it's useful in an advisory capacity, but not accurate enough to be enforced. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
